Anyone who attends a women's writing group feels the magic, the alchemy. In fact, women have always
gravitated toward other women, whether it was a sewing circle in the 1800's or
a book club today. The safety, the security . . . the implicit understanding that we, as women,
travel a common journey forms a bond beyond words.
Women only groups have great value as a place to share, empathize and validate as I learned firsthand by attending a woman's writing retreat which was the catalyst to my memoir journey for Again in a Heartbeat five years ago.
Women only groups have great value as a place to share, empathize and validate as I learned firsthand by attending a woman's writing retreat which was the catalyst to my memoir journey for Again in a Heartbeat five years ago.
I can only imagine how different my life would have been if I had not been there.
Our June meeting was the first time a man had attended a read-around of the Women’s Writing Circle. Boyd Lemon, the author of a memoir Digging Deep about the failure of his three marriages, was our visitor. Boyd offered the male perspective, as well as the vulnerability that comes with memoir writing. By the end of writing his story, he confided, he understood that the failure of his marriages was in large part due to the unconditional love and acceptance he found from his mother and his desire that his wives replicate that.
This candid admission gave
powerful insight into the self-discovery of memoir and its healing journey that
goes beyond gender issues and is the basis for the genre's growing popularity, not just among writers but readers. This admission also led to a discussion
about some men and their changing roles; their confusion, as Boyd
put it, on how to “deal” with the feminist movement.
“I’ve been in writing groups before where men
try to dominate,” one woman confessed.
Finally upon reflection that same day, all the
women – totaling 14 – agreed to put their skepticism aside and be open to a
man’s presence in the writing circle. After
Boyd’s visit this past weekend, the overwhelming consensus was that Boyd was a
special man, an excellent writer and a valuable resource for writing techniques
and honest truth-telling in memoir.
Still, the question persisted.
Would the writing circle be open to men in the future?
While our Women’s Writing Circle workshops have
always been open to men, the read-around . . . which is often a raw and intimate
sharing of our emotional and psychic lives, has not.
Upon reflection, I believe – at least for now –
it is important that read-arounds remain open only to women. While my hope
is that Boyd is the first of several published authors – male and female to visit
our read-around from time to time - here is my thinking on why the read-arounds should remain
open only to women.
The Women's Writing Circle . . . I view it as a communal, meditative and restorative place for women to write their stories. It is also a fact that we (women) have been downtrodden as a sort of "minority" group for a long time. We don't view our Women’s Writing Circle as discriminatory, rather it is a freeing atmosphere.
Many of our writers are beginning the journey of finding their voice through the written word. This is worth more than gold. It is a matter, not just of the heart, but
the soul. Any sabotaging could cause
irrevocable damage.
One of the reasons I suggest women
in the Circle be careful who they show their work is due to the word “victim” that is sometimes applied to women who write the truth of their stories. I believe it is the woman writer's worst fear
- that the old patriarchal stereotype of women as "victim" and as
"whiner" will be thrown at her when she writes the truth of her
story.
And while it is true that people are responsible for their actions, it is also true they are not responsible for society’s stereotypes and social actions.

Many of our writers have never before been heard. The read-around is their time to tell their stories, read them aloud and "test drive" their voices in a supportive, nurturing and learning environment.
Mary Pierce Brosmer, founder of
Women Writing For (a) Change, writes in her book of the same name about her group's read-arounds:
And while it is true that people are responsible for their actions, it is also true they are not responsible for society’s stereotypes and social actions.
“WWfaC read-arounds are radical in that they are simply and persistently by, for and about women’s words. Radical in that we are going to the imbalance in our culture, and on a small scale, attempting to heal the attention deficit women and girls have historically experienced by keeping our attention on women’s – and girls’ words.”
So for now, we shall continue valuing and loving one another in our journey of the feminine. But, as always, time will tell and we shall see . . . where the path leads, keeping ourselves open and remaining hopeful that our words will bring all of us closer together.
No comments:
Post a Comment